{"id":2258,"date":"2020-10-23T09:24:03","date_gmt":"2020-10-23T09:24:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/?post_type=ht_kb&#038;p=2258"},"modified":"2026-10-28T11:16:29","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T11:16:29","slug":"academic-appeals-procedure","status":"publish","type":"ht_kb","link":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/academic-appeals-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Academic Appeals Procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>If you require this document in an alternative format please contact <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">1. Introduction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.1<\/strong> Within this procedure, the term \u2018student\u2019 includes current students and former students who are eligible to submit an academic appeal within the timescales set out in Section 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.2<\/strong> An academic appeal is a request for the University to review a decision made by an academic body about a mark, grade, progression decision or award.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.3<\/strong> Academic appeals can only be considered where a student believes there are valid grounds for appeal, as set out in Section 9. An appeal is not an opportunity to challenge academic judgement or request a re-mark because you disagree with the mark or grade awarded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.4<\/strong> Assessment marks and grades remain provisional until they have been confirmed by the relevant Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel. Appeals cannot be considered against provisional marks or grades.<br><br><strong>1.5<\/strong> You have the right to submit one academic appeal against a decision of a Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel, provided that your appeal meets the requirements of this procedure.<br><br><strong>1.6<\/strong> Further guidance on submitting an academic appeal is available on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/appeals-and-complaints\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/appeals-and-complaints\/\">Academic Appeals and Student Complaints<\/a> webpage.<br><br><strong>1.7<\/strong> A glossary explaining some of the terms used in this procedure is available at <a href=\"#appendix\">Appendix 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">2. Principles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.1<\/strong>. This procedure is based on the principles of fairness, transparency and proportionality and is aligned with the UK Quality Code for Higher Education, and the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA) Good Practice Framework for Handling Complaints and Academic Appeals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.2. <\/strong>We will consider and implement reasonable adjustments at any stage of the academic appeals process to support you to engage with the procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.3<\/strong> You will not be disadvantaged or treated unfairly for submitting an academic appeal in good faith.<br><br><strong>2.4<\/strong> We expect you, and anyone supporting or representing you, to engage with the academic appeals process reasonably and respectfully. &nbsp;We recognise that you may be experiencing difficult circumstances when using this procedure. However, we expect all communications and interactions will remain courteous and appropriate.&nbsp; We have a duty to provide a safe and respectful environment for staff and students. We will not accept behaviour that is abusive, threatening, harassing, intimidating, vexatious, or otherwise inappropriate towards staff or others involved in the academic appeals process. &nbsp;Where behaviour affects the wellbeing of others or prevents the effective operation of the process, we may take appropriate action in line with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/student-community-code-of-conduct\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/student-community-code-of-conduct\/\">Student Community Code of Conduct<\/a> and may put reasonable measures in place to protect those involved and support the fair and effective administration of the process. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.5<\/strong> The outcome of an academic appeal will depend on the circumstances of the case. Where an appeal is upheld, the outcome will usually involve practical remedies, such as the opportunity to retake an assessment or reconsideration of the original decision by the relevant academic body.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">3. Privacy and Confidentiality<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.1<\/strong> We will handle your academic appeal sensitively and in accordance with Data Protection legislation and the University&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/student-privacy-notice\/\">Student Privacy Notice<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.2<\/strong> Information about your academic appeal only be shared with people who need it to consider, investigate or reach a decision on your appeal, or where disclosure is required by law or is in the public interest. Everyone involved in the appeal is expected to respect its confidentiality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.3 <\/strong>By submitting an academic appeal, you understand that we may need to share the information you provide with relevant members of staff so that your appeal can be considered. This may include members of the relevant School and \/ or Professional Service, Board of Examiners, Award and Progression Panel or Academic Appeals Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.4<\/strong> If your academic appeal includes particularly sensitive information and you have concerns about how it will be shared, please contact the Governance and Legal Team at appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk before or when you submit your appeal. We will discuss whether it is possible to limit the disclosure of sensitive information while still allowing your appeal to be considered fairly.<br><br><strong>3.5<\/strong> In some circumstances, we may not be able to consider your appeal if we cannot share enough information with the relevant people involved in the process. If this happens, we will explain why and discuss the options available to you.<br><br><strong>3.6<\/strong> Please only include personal information that is relevant to your appeal. If you include personal information about another person, you should only do so where it is necessary and appropriate, and where possible, you should have their permission to share it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">4. Who can use this procedure?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4.1<\/strong> You can use this procedure if you are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">a current student of the University; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">a former student, provided you submit your appeal within the timescales set out in Section 10.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4.2 <\/strong>It is expected that you will submit your academic appeal yourself.&nbsp; If you cannot do this, we may, in exceptional circumstances, accept an appeal from someone acting on your behalf.<br><br><strong>4.3<\/strong> If you would like another person, such as a family member or representative, to submit or discuss an academic appeal on your behalf, you will need to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">explain why you cannot raise the appeal yourself;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">complete a third-party consent form (available from <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a>); and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">confirm that you agree with the appeal being submitted on your behalf.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>You will normally still be expected to take part in the academic appeals process, with support from the third party where appropriate.<br><br><strong>4.5<\/strong> You may be accompanied, supported or advised at any stage of the academic appeals process by another member of the University community. This could include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">a current student of the University;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">a member of University staff; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">a representative or elected officer of the University of Gloucestershire Students&#8217; Union.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4.6<\/strong> If you would like someone to represent or act on your behalf during the appeals process, that person should be a member of the University community. We will also consider requests for someone outside the University community where appropriate, including where this is needed as a reasonable adjustment or to support your participation in the process.<br><br><strong>4.7<\/strong> If you are under 18, you should be accompanied by a parent, guardian or another responsible adult.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">5. Advice and Support<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5.1<\/strong> You can seek independent advice and support from the Students\u2019 Union at <a href=\"mailto:suadvice@glos.ac.uk\">suadvice@glos.ac.uk<\/a>.<br><br><strong>5.2<\/strong> If you need support with your wellbeing, accessibility or other aspects of your student experience, you can contact the <a href=\"https:\/\/connectglosac.sharepoint.com\/sites\/myhelp\/SitePages\/HelpZones.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Student Centres<\/a>.<br><br><strong>5.3<\/strong> If you have questions about how the academic appeals process works or need guidance on using this procedure, you can contact us at <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">What is an Academic Appeal?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>6.1<\/strong> An academic appeal is a request for the University to review a decision made by a Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel about:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">an assessment mark or grade;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">progression to the next stage of your programme; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">an award decision.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>6.2<\/strong> An academic appeal is not a way to challenge academic judgement.<br><br><strong>6.3<\/strong> Academic judgement means the professional judgement made by academic staff when assessing the quality of your work, assigning marks or making academic decisions. You cannot appeal simply because you disagree with the mark, grade or outcome awarded, and you cannot request a re-mark through this procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">What can you appeal?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>7.1<\/strong>&nbsp;You can submit an academic appeal if you believe that one or more of the grounds for appeal set out in Section 9 apply.<br><br><strong>7.2<\/strong> You should explain clearly why you believe your appeal meets the relevant grounds and provide any supporting evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">Matters not covered by this procedure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>8.1<\/strong> The Academic Appeals Procedure cannot be used for matters that are covered by another University procedure. These include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">complaints about teaching, supervision, academic advice or other services provided by the University;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">concerns about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/investigative-procedures-for-student-matters\/\">another student\u2019s behaviour<\/a>;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">complaints about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/fitness-to-practise-procedures\/\">professional suitability, fitness to practise<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/supported-study-procedures-2\/\">supported study<\/a> matters;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">appeals against provisional marks or grades;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">disagreement with academic judgement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>8.2<\/strong> If your concerns relate to a service or experience during your programme of study, you may be able to raise these through the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/student-complaints-procedure\/\">Student Complaints Procedure<\/a>.<br><br><strong>8.3<\/strong> If you submit an appeal which is more appropriately considered under another University procedure, we will explain this and advise you on the next steps. Where appropriate, we may consider matters under more than one procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">9. Grounds for Appeal<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>9<strong>.1<\/strong> You can submit an academic appeal if you believe one or both of the following apply:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>a) <strong>Exceptional Circumstances <\/strong><br><br><strong>There were circumstances which affected your performance <u>and<\/u> which, for good reason, you were unable to tell the Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel about before it made its decision.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You should provide relevant evidence to support your appeal where appropriate. &nbsp;Medical evidence should be provided at the time the circumstances occurred. Retrospective medical evidence will only normally be considered where there is a reasonable explanation for why it was not available earlier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>b) <strong>Administrative Error or Procedural Irregularity<\/strong><br><br><strong>There was a significant University administrative error or procedural irregularity during the assessment process which may have affected the mark, grade or decision reached.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>9.2<\/strong> You cannot appeal against academic judgement. This means that you cannot appeal because you disagree with the professional judgement of academic staff when assessing your work or making an academic decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>9.3<\/strong> If your appeal includes concerns about teaching, supervision, academic advice or other services provided by the University, these should be raised through the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/student-complaints-procedure\/\">Student Complaints Procedure<\/a> at the time they occur. Such concerns cannot normally be introduced later as grounds for an academic appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">10. Timescales<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>10.1 <\/strong>You should submit an academic appeal within <strong>20 working days<\/strong> of the Board of Examiners, Award and Progression Panel, or other academic body at which the decision you are appealing was confirmed.<br><br><strong>10.2<\/strong> You should raise concerns as soon as possible with your School where appropriate, as early discussion may help resolve issues or clarify whether you have grounds for appeal. However, seeking informal advice or resolution does not extend the deadline for submitting a formal academic appeal.<br><br><strong>10.3<\/strong> We may consider appeals submitted outside this timescale where there is a good reason for the delay and you can provide supporting information.<br><br><strong>10.4<\/strong> We aim to complete the consideration of a formal appeal, including any review stage, within 90 calendar days. To help us meet this timescale, you should provide any information requested and respond within the deadlines provided.<br><br><strong>10.5<\/strong> In some circumstances, it may not be possible to complete an appeal within 90 calendar days, for example where the appeal is complex, involves a number of issues, or requires information from other people or teams. If there is a delay, we will explain the reason, keep you updated on progress and provide an expected timescale for completion.<br><br><strong>10.6<\/strong> For the purposes of this procedure, a working day means Monday to Friday, excluding bank holidays and University closure days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">11. Stages of the Academic Appeals Process<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>11.1<\/strong>  If you think you have grounds for an academic appeal, the process normally has three stages:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Early Local Resolution:<\/strong> Raise your concerns with the relevant Module Tutor, Academic Course Leader or School as soon as possible to see whether the matter can be resolved informally.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Formal Academic Appeal:<\/strong> If the matter cannot be resolved informally and you believe you have valid grounds for appeal, you can submit a formal academic appeal.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Review:<\/strong> If you remain dissatisfied with the outcome of your formal appeal, you may be able to request a further review, depending on the outcome of your appeal and the grounds set out in this procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">12. Early Local Resolution<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>12.1<\/strong> Before submitting a formal academic appeal, you should discuss your concerns with the relevant School or academic team where appropriate. This may include, for example, a Module Tutor, Academic Course Leader or another appropriate member of staff.<br><br><strong>12.2<\/strong> Early resolution provides an opportunity to clarify the decision you are concerned about, understand the information considered, and resolve any issues where possible without the need for a formal appeal.<br><br><strong>12.3<\/strong> You may also wish to seek independent advice and support from the Students\u2019 Union at <a href=\"mailto:suadvice@glos.ac.uk\">suadvice@glos.ac.uk<\/a> before submitting an academic appeal.<br><br><strong>12.4<\/strong> If your concerns cannot be resolved informally, or if informal resolution is not appropriate, you may submit a formal academic appeal if you believe you have valid grounds under Section 9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">13. Formal Academic Appeal<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.1<\/strong> If you wish to submit a formal academic appeal, you must complete the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/knowledge-base\/appeals-and-complaints\/\">Academic Appeals Form<\/a> and email it to the Governance and Legal Team at appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk within the timescale set out in Section 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.2<\/strong> Your Academic Appeals Form should include \/ explain:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">your name and University student number;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">your course title;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the decision you are appealing, including the relevant module, assessment or award\/progression decision;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the grounds for appeal you are relying on;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">why you believe those grounds apply;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">any relevant supporting evidence; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the outcome you are seeking.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If you are studying through a collaborative partner organisation, you should also provide details of the partner organisation and any outcome from their internal appeal process.<br><br><strong>13.3<\/strong> Please keep your appeal to a reasonable length and focus on the key issues you would like us to consider. You should provide relevant evidence when you submit your appeal, such as correspondence or other documents that support your case.&nbsp; If we need further information or clarification, we will let you know what is required and provide a reasonable timeframe for you to provide it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.4<\/strong> We will normally acknowledge receipt of your appeal within 5 working days. If you have not received an acknowledgement within this timeframe, please contact <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a> to confirm that your appeal has been received.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.5<\/strong> Once your appeal has been received, we will check whether it meets the requirements of this procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.6<\/strong> An appeal may not be eligible for consideration where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">it does not identify a valid ground for appeal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">it is only challenging academic judgement;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">it has been submitted outside the deadline without a good reason;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">there is insufficient information or evidence to support the grounds of appeal.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13.7<\/strong> If your appeal is eligible for consideration, the relevant School and where appropriate, Professional Service, will be asked to provide information and a response to the issues raised.<br><br><strong>13.8<\/strong> You will be given an opportunity to comment on any response provided before your appeal is considered by the Academic Appeals Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading is-2 is-2--mobile\">14. Consideration by Academic Appeals Group<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.1<\/strong> Your appeal will be considered by an Academic Appeals Group made up of members who have had no previous involvement in your case or the matters being appealed. The Group will include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">a senior member of staff;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the Head of Governance and Legal (or nominee); and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">an elected officer of the Students\u2019 Union.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.2<\/strong> The Academic Appeals Group will consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">the grounds for appeal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the information and evidence provided;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">any response from the relevant School and where appropriate, Professional Service; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">any comments you have provided on that response.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.3<\/strong> The Academic Appeals Group may decide to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">uphold your appeal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">partially uphold your appeal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">not uphold your appeal, but advise that it may be considered further by an Academic Appeals Review Panel; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">reject your appeal as invalid because it does not meet the grounds for appeal or the requirements of this procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.4 <\/strong>We will write to you, normally within 5 working days, explaining the decision, the reasons for it and any next steps available to you. If there is a delay in providing a decision, then we will inform you of the delay together with the expected timescale for a decision to be provided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.5<\/strong> If your appeal is upheld or partially upheld, the Academic Appeals Group will recommend that the relevant Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel reconsiders its original decision. This does not mean your marks will automatically change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.6<\/strong> If your appeal is rejected as invalid, you may request a review of that decision by writing to the Governance and Legal Team at appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk <strong>within 10 working days <\/strong>of receiving the outcome. A review will only consider whether:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">there was a significant procedural error in how your appeal was considered;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the decision was unreasonable in the circumstances; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">there is new evidence that you could not, for good reason, have provided earlier, and which may have affected the outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>14.7<\/strong> The review will be carried out by a member of staff who has had no previous involvement in your appeal. The purpose of the review is to consider whether correct procedures were followed and whether the outcome was reasonable.&nbsp; It is not a further consideration of your appeal or an opportunity to raise new grounds of appeal, unless they relate to new evidence that could not reasonably have been provided earlier.<br><br><strong>14.8<\/strong> You will normally receive the outcome of the review within 10 working days. The review decision is final under the University&#8217;s internal procedures. Where appropriate, you will receive a Completion of Procedures Letter explaining your right to refer your case to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA).<br><br><strong>14.9<\/strong> If the Academic Appeals Group decides that your appeal is not upheld but advises that it may be considered further by an Academic Appeals Review Panel, you may request a Review Panel by writing to the Governance and Legal Team at appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk <strong>within 10 working days<\/strong> of receiving the outcome.<br><br><strong>14.10<\/strong> Your request should explain why you remain dissatisfied and the outcome you are seeking.&nbsp; You do not normally need to provide any further information at this stage. New grounds of appeal or new evidence will only be considered where you could not reasonably have provided them earlier.<br><br><strong>14.12<\/strong> If your request is accepted, your appeal will be considered by an Academic Appeals Review Panel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">15. Academic Appeals Review Panel<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>15.1<\/strong> If your appeal proceeds to an Academic Appeals Review Panel, we will arrange the hearing as soon as possible, usually within 20 working days of receiving your request.<br><br><strong>15.2<\/strong> The Academic Appeals Review Panel will include members who have had no previous involvement in your appeal. The Panel will normally include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">an independent Chair;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">two members of academic staff who have not been involved in your case, one of whom will normally be a member of Academic Board;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">a student member nominated by the Students&#8217; Union;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">an elected officer of the Students&#8217; Union (non-voting); and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">a representative from Governance and Legal to support the Panel and administer the hearing. This person will not take part in the decision-making.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>A quorum will be three voting members including the Chair.<br><br><strong>15.3<\/strong> You and the relevant University representative(s) will be provided with the documentation the Panel will consider, normally 5 working days before the hearing. You should provide any additional information you wish the Panel to consider by the deadline given. Information received after this deadline will only be considered where the Chair decides there is a good reason to accept it and that doing so would be fair to everyone involved.<br><br><strong>15.4<\/strong> You will be expected to attend the hearing to present your case and answer any questions of clarification. If you cannot attend, you should let appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk know as soon as possible. We will consider any reasons you have given for being unable to attend, including whether any reasonable adjustments or alternative arrangements are needed to support your participation.&nbsp; If you choose not to attend, or if it not possible to make alternative arrangements, the Panel may proceed in your absence.<br><br><strong>15.5<\/strong> You may be accompanied or represented at the hearing in accordance with Section 4 of this procedure. Your representative may support you and, where appropriate, speak on your behalf, but they should not answer questions or give evidence unless they have direct knowledge of the matters being considered.<br><br><strong>15.6<\/strong> You should tell notify us at <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a> of the name and status of anyone accompanying or representing you at least 4 working days before the hearing. If this changes because of unexpected circumstances, please let us know as soon as possible. The Chair may allow a late change where this would be fair to everyone involved.<br><br><strong>15.7<\/strong> The hearing will normally take place online using Microsoft Teams. An in-person hearing may be arranged where appropriate and where the University is able to accommodate this.<br><br><strong>15.8<\/strong> Where appropriate, you and the University representative(s) will normally attend the hearing at the same time so that everyone can hear the information presented to the Panel and have an opportunity to comment. If there are reasons why this would not be appropriate, either party may ask to be heard separately. The Chair will decide the most appropriate arrangements, taking account of the circumstances of the case.<br><br><strong>15.9<\/strong> The Panel will consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">your appeal and the supporting evidence;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the decision of the Academic Appeals Group;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the response from the relevant School and, where appropriate, Professional Service;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">the grounds on which the appeal has been referred to the Panel; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">any relevant information provided during the review process.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>15.10<\/strong> The panel may:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\">uphold the appeal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">partially uphold the appeal; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\">not uphold the appeal.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>15.11<\/strong> If the appeal is upheld or partially upheld, the Panel will recommend that the relevant Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel reconsiders its original decision. This does not mean your marks will automatically change.<br><br><strong>15.12<\/strong> There may be occasions when the Panel needs further information or more time before reaching a decision. If this happens, the hearing may be adjourned, or the Panel may consider further information after the hearing. We will let you know if this is necessary.<br><br><strong>15.13<\/strong> You will receive the Panel&#8217;s decision in writing, usually within 5 working days of the hearing. The outcome will explain the decision, the reasons for it and any action to be taken.<br><br><strong>15.14<\/strong> This concludes the University&#8217;s internal Academic Appeals Procedure. If you remain dissatisfied, you may be able to refer your appeal to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA). You will receive a Completion of Procedures Letter explaining your right to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">16. <strong>Outcomes and Remedies<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>16.1<\/strong> The outcome of an academic appeal will depend on the circumstances of your case and the evidence considered. An appeal may be upheld, partially upheld or not upheld.<br><br><strong>16.2<\/strong> Where an appeal is upheld or partially upheld, the University will consider what action is appropriate to address the issues identified. This may include asking the relevant Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel to reconsider its original decision or providing another appropriate academic remedy.<br><br><strong>16.3<\/strong> An academic appeal cannot result in your marks being changed simply because you disagree with the academic judgement of the examiners. Where an appeal is successful, any remedy will be consistent with the University&#8217;s Academic Regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">17. Review by the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>17.1<\/strong> If you have completed the University\u2019s Academic Appeals Procedure and remain dissatisfied with the outcome, you may be able to refer your appeal to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA).&nbsp; The OIA can only consider appeals that are eligible under its Rules.<br><br><strong>17.2<\/strong> Once the University\u2019s appeals procedure has been completed, you will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter. This confirms that our internal process has ended and explains your right to refer your appeal to the OIA.<br><br><strong>17.3<\/strong> If you wish to refer your appeal to the OIA, you must do so within 12 months of the date of your Completion of Procedures Letter using the OIA\u2019s Scheme Application Form. Further information and the application form are available from the OIA website or from the Governance and Legal Team at <a href=\"mailto:appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk\">appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\">18. Recording, Reporting and Learning from Complaints<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>18.1<\/strong> We will keep appropriate records of academic appeals to monitor trends, identify areas for improvement and support learning across the University.<br><br><strong>18.2<\/strong> An anonymised annual report on formal academic appeals, including the number, nature and outcomes of appeals, will be presented to Academic Board and University Council.&nbsp;<br><br><strong>18.3<\/strong> Academic appeal records will be stored and disposed of in accordance with the University\u2019s Data Protection Policy and Records Retention Schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"heading wp-block-heading\" id=\"appendix\">Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Academic Appeal<\/strong><br>A request for the University to review a decision about your assessment, progression or award. An academic appeal must be based on the grounds set out in this procedure and cannot be made simply because you disagree with academic judgement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Academic judgement<\/strong><br>A decision made by academic staff about the quality of your work or your academic performance. Academic judgement cannot be challenged through the Academic Appeals Procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Board of Examiners<\/strong><br>The University body responsible for approving assessment marks and making decisions about progression, awards and classifications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Award and Progression Panel<\/strong><br>The University panel responsible for confirming decisions about progression or awards for some programmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Early local resolution<\/strong><br>The first stage of the appeals process, where you raise your concerns with the relevant Module Tutor, Academic Course Leader or School to see whether the matter can be resolved informally, where appropriate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Formal Academic Appeal<\/strong><br>An appeal submitted using the Academic Appeals Form which is considered under the University&#8217;s Academic Appeals Procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Academic Appeals Group<\/strong><br>The group that considers formal academic appeals and decides whether an appeal should be upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or rejected as invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Academic Appeals Review Panel<\/strong><br>An independent panel that considers eligible appeals referred by the Academic Appeals Group. The Panel reviews the appeal and reaches a final decision under the University&#8217;s internal procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\" no-mb\"><strong>Grounds for appeal<\/strong><br>The reasons on which you can submit an academic appeal. These are set out in Section 7 of this procedure.<br><strong><br>Outcome<\/strong><br>The decision reached after your appeal has been considered. The outcome will normally be one of the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\" no-mt\"><strong>Upheld &#8211; <\/strong>the University agrees that your appeal is supported by the evidence and appropriate action will be taken.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Partially upheld<\/strong> \u2013 the University agrees that some aspects of your appeal are supported by the evidence and appropriate action will be taken where necessary.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Not upheld<\/strong> \u2013 the University has considered your appeal but has not found sufficient evidence to support it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Remedy<\/strong><br>Action taken by the University following a successful appeal. This may include asking the relevant Board of Examiners or Award and Progression Panel to reconsider its decision or another appropriate academic remedy. A successful appeal does not automatically result in your marks being changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Representative<\/strong><br>A person who is authorised to act or communicate on your behalf during the appeals process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Supporter<\/strong><br>A person who accompanies or assists you during the appeals process but does not normally act or communicate on your behalf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Completion of Procedures Letter<\/strong><br>A letter issued by the University when its internal Academic Appeals Procedure has ended. It confirms the final outcome and explains whether you can refer your appeal to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA)<\/strong><br>An independent body that reviews eligible student complaints and academic appeals after a higher education provider&#8217;s internal procedures have been completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you require this document in an alternative format please contact appealsandcomplaints@glos.ac.uk 1. Introduction 1.1 Within this procedure, the term \u2018student\u2019 includes current students and former students who are eligible to submit an academic appeal within the timescales set out in Section 10. 1.2 An academic appeal is a request for the University to review [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":116,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_searchwp_excluded":"","footnotes":""},"schools":[],"campuses":[],"subject_area":[],"ht-kb-category":[],"ht-kb-tag":[],"class_list":["post-2258","ht_kb","type-ht_kb","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/2258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ht_kb"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2258"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/2258\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21791,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/2258\/revisions\/21791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"schools","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/schools?post=2258"},{"taxonomy":"campuses","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/campuses?post=2258"},{"taxonomy":"subject_area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/subject_area?post=2258"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-category?post=2258"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glos.ac.uk\/information\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-tag?post=2258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}